Elizabeth Marxs – Naked Invitation

Posted on November 15, 2014

Elizabeth Marxs - Naked Invitation , 4.5 out of 5 based on 234 ratings
Share this Gallery
Share on FacebookShare on Google+Share on StumbleUponShare on TumblrDigg thisShare on RedditPin on PinterestTweet about this on Twitter

Rate this Gallery

GD Star Rating
loading...

What Others Are Saying

  1. CherryGazer June 7, 2016 at 11:55 pm

    Ok, I guess my post is too long? I’ll try doing it in several posts..

    These photo sequences that go from clothed, to topless, to nude but shy, to showing everything are by far my favorite type of porn. Nearly every shoot has at least a few shots I think are hot, and quite a few that have issues from my point of view. It’s rare to find one that has really hot shots in each phase of undress..

    a – clothed
    b – topless
    c – naked but shy (side and angled rear shots, etc)
    d – almost baring all (the angle just barely hides her nethers)
    e – baring all

    ..which is kind of frustrating to me, so I like to try to provide some somewhat detailed feedback to nude models and their photographers in pursuit of a (probably completely futile) fantasy that some of them will get what I’m saying and produce more shoots with super hot shots in every phase.

    I suspect I’m nowhere near alone in seeing what I see, but, of course I might be wrong.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • CherryGazer June 8, 2016 at 5:19 pm

      In the process of cutting and pasting, I stupidly lost the rest of my post,
      so now I’m using notepad, and pasting pieces into replies, in order to get the whole post in.
      (Also I’m trying to shorten it, some.)

      On a side note, this look reminds me a bit of Sarah Shahi’s look in Person of Interest.
      I can pretend I’m getting to see “Sameen Shaw” naked, that’s pretty fun. =D

      Absolutely gorgeous girl (even hotter than Sarah, I think), but I feel like there is a lot of room for improvement in the posing and lighting of this shoot, and that’s what I want to talk about.

      I love the very nice, smooth complexion. I don’t care at all if it’s Photoshop. If I can’t see the edits, to me, that’s good work.

      Ms Marx seems to have a bit of a high hip. If you were to put a belt on her, just above the hip, it looks like it would pass above her belly button by several inches.
      That’s a pretty high hip. If you’re working with a high hip, you have to be careful to use poses that downplay that to avoid making her look like she’s half pelvis and half torso.
      (“Half” is an exxageration, obviously, but hopefully it illustrates the point.) The straight on shots in this shoot, like 1, 2, 14 and 16 are suffering some from that effect, imo.
      I’d try angling the pose so it isn’t so straight on, or maybe use a little more sass.. something. The point is to make that high hip disappear. I don’t really see the half-pelvis effect
      in any of the non-straight on poses, so. It seems like making it dissappear isn’t too hard to do. Also spreading the legs seems to help.

      11 is excellent example of showcasing her very nice pelvic curves while making that high hip disappear. That’s an excellent, excellent pose for her.
      I would Love to see a follow up for 11, in the same pose, without the bottoms.
      That would give this shoot at least one sizzling hot E (money) shot.

      Just about everything is going right in 11. The only slight issue might be a lighting / depth perception issue.
      There’s something going on with the lighting, or maybe it’s patterning in the background (the couch).. not exactly sure what it is, but something is causing a number of the images in this shoot to look a bit flat in terms of depth perception.
      So instead of looking like a super hot leg is coming out of the picture toward you, the picture looks flattish and the leg looks fattish.
      I see that going on in 4, 11, 19 and 20. I think it is mainly the patterning in the couch, but it might be lighting.
      I would suggest covering the couch with a non-patterned (or differently patterned) douvet or something, and moving the lights around a little to try to produce more clear depth.

      I would delete 12. Her face is super nice, you can’t hardly do anything bad with that face, but it looks like the rest of her is being contorted into some kind of vaguely spherical shape.

      15 is just almost there. But to me I feel like the breasts are hanging just a little low, the hand is covering a curve I’d sure prefer to see (except that I know about the high hip from other shots),
      and her tush curves start a little low (low tail). So the pose in 15 might not be the best pose for her. Maybe try moving the cammera up several feet, so that you’re kind of looking down at her at angle, get her arms up over her head, and play with the angle and the lighting.
      The goals would be to lift the breasts and showcase those gorgeous pelvic curves while hiding or downplaying the high hip and the low tail.

      I love the breasts in 17 and 21. Very very nice. Super hot. I’d like to see shots with those poses that show the rest of her.
      The pose in 21 might make for a sizzling hot D shot (nude, but not quite baring all, because of the angle of her nethers).
      Maybe do a spread legged straddle with a slightly arched lower back. You would see her genital area, but the camera angle would hide the details.

      I don’t think I can look at any money shot of this girl without getting some pretty serious zing, but to me the slouch in 20 makes for an ugly pose.
      I would suggest lying her down flat somewhere for that up the (absent) skirt shot.

      Her breasts produce salivation almost no matter how you pose them, but to me these straight on angles with the arms down are very far from ideal.
      That pose produces droop and spread. Nobody’s breasts look nearly as hot in that kind of pose as they do when you lift the arms, arch the back (to one degree or another) and angle the torso.

      So that’s my feedback, I hope it’s helpful.
      I absolutely do not intend to sound negative about the model or the general effort made with her.
      She is such a gorgeous girl, and this is a really great look for her, so I hope the decision is made to try this shoot (or one like it) again.
      As it is, the shoot has some pretty hot A and B shots, but the C, D and E shots would be so much hotter if they were posed a little differently.

      cg

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  2. CherryGazer June 7, 2016 at 11:54 pm

    test post…

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  3. abo elazbar April 9, 2016 at 4:42 pm

    She makes my dick mad …It becomes 21 feet

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  4. TijuanaBoobs February 7, 2016 at 9:33 am

    I love her!! 5/5

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  5. Anonymous May 21, 2015 at 4:56 am

    22 = Emma Watson face, I think

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  6. Womanlovers December 29, 2014 at 2:22 pm

    Fucking gorgeous.

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  7. J Rock December 3, 2014 at 1:49 pm

    Let’s be real h8ers if she wanted anyone of u losers u would get with it in a heartbeat #SheSexy lets go

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  8. jimmySA169 November 18, 2014 at 6:21 am

    Still one of the hottest, most attractive models around…. Amazing!!!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  9. Anonymous November 16, 2014 at 8:26 pm

    Ungodly amount of photoshop, probably covered in stretch marks. This chick is Playboy material? what a joke

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous November 17, 2014 at 8:01 pm

      Yep, when she went by Laura TSC in her earlier days there were a couple of untouched shoots. Her body is a mess.

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
      • Anonymous November 17, 2014 at 8:32 pm

        One..I’ve seen her on other sites and it’s not as “bad” as you make it out to be.Two, a large % of the so called hot girls would look “less than”, if you took away the retouching and airbrushing.. And lastly, odds are she’s still better than any piece either of you have ever gotten or will get…..

        GD Star Rating
        loading...
        • Anonymous November 18, 2014 at 9:57 pm

          I’m sorry your standards are so low, I’ve had way better.

          GD Star Rating
          loading...
          • Anthonywashere November 21, 2014 at 11:12 pm

            You want to explain what you mean by “standards are so low” and “way better”. she looks like she got everything for a fucking good time. you just sound wanker who sits in front of a computer to much and doesn’t meet some real girls.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
          • Anonymous December 2, 2014 at 10:24 am

            I highly doubt that but it’s always nice to dream……

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
          • Slave of Lust May 22, 2015 at 8:59 pm

            Be nice. If you don’t like her, you don’t have to look.

            I’m not a big Elizabeth Marxs fan but the woman has a beautiful face. In my opinion, her body would be better without the tats but let’s be honest… she could have me in a minute with nothing more than a smile.

            GD Star Rating
            loading...
  10. Anonymous November 15, 2014 at 8:42 pm

    Little chunky……..C+

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
    • Anonymous November 16, 2014 at 12:10 pm

      get the fuck out of here with that shit…little chunky? what a idiot!

      GD Star Rating
      loading...
  11. z November 15, 2014 at 5:15 pm

    She never failed to turn me on

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  12. Anonymous November 15, 2014 at 3:31 pm

    a true natural beauty <3 <3

    GD Star Rating
    loading...
  13. Anonymous November 15, 2014 at 10:59 am

    Simply gorgeous!

    GD Star Rating
    loading...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.